Thursday, August 6, 2009
Shakespeare in English class RANT!
Thursday, August 06, 2009 | Posted by
Phillip |
Edit Post
Just to make this clear: I don't hate Shakespeare... I actually respect Shakespeare's work, but not the idea of it being taught at schools in English class where the main problem for 16 year olds is grade 6 spelling (And why is it grade 6 then year 7? We get grades in primary school but years when we're in high school?)
Basically, to pass the subject of English, we must do well in our studies of Elizabethan Language, which is not in common use in 2009 (at least here in Australia).
So what is the reason to learn the Elizabethan language in English class instead of just Literature class? Sure, no big deal, only a small part of life etc etc... but I just don't know why it's been chosen to be taught at schools in English class (Literature class is fine: it's a different subject).
Many people like Shakespeare's work. Cool!
But whose idea was it to make everybody learn Shakespeare in English class? If I write up an essay in university for History should I be using the Elizabethan language instead? Oh! My mistake -.-
As a side note, why aren't we taught Australian bush slang, and the works of Banjo Patterson? If I mention "Waltzing Matilda" in class tomorrow, only half of the students would know what I'm talking about.
I know of many people in year 11 in my English class who can't speak English properly, let alone spell half decently. Not only are these kids confused about the play "Macbeth" in class, but also haven't improved their English skills as of late....or ever!
In all respect, I actually like the plot of "Macbeth" which is what we're studying at the moment. Awesome plot line actually.
And for those who say "what's wrong with Shakespeare" - nothing's wrong, I just want to learn more of English than Shakespearian.
I thought Shakespeare was only taught in Literature (a separate subject) so I was relieved. Oh, how I was wrong! It's like turning up to music class being told to find the true bearings of a N40E angle or something. Dissapointed!
Basically, to pass the subject of English, we must do well in our studies of Elizabethan Language, which is not in common use in 2009 (at least here in Australia).
So what is the reason to learn the Elizabethan language in English class instead of just Literature class? Sure, no big deal, only a small part of life etc etc... but I just don't know why it's been chosen to be taught at schools in English class (Literature class is fine: it's a different subject).
Many people like Shakespeare's work. Cool!
But whose idea was it to make everybody learn Shakespeare in English class? If I write up an essay in university for History should I be using the Elizabethan language instead? Oh! My mistake -.-
As a side note, why aren't we taught Australian bush slang, and the works of Banjo Patterson? If I mention "Waltzing Matilda" in class tomorrow, only half of the students would know what I'm talking about.
I know of many people in year 11 in my English class who can't speak English properly, let alone spell half decently. Not only are these kids confused about the play "Macbeth" in class, but also haven't improved their English skills as of late....or ever!
In all respect, I actually like the plot of "Macbeth" which is what we're studying at the moment. Awesome plot line actually.
And for those who say "what's wrong with Shakespeare" - nothing's wrong, I just want to learn more of English than Shakespearian.
I thought Shakespeare was only taught in Literature (a separate subject) so I was relieved. Oh, how I was wrong! It's like turning up to music class being told to find the true bearings of a N40E angle or something. Dissapointed!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment